首页> 外文OA文献 >The resistance experiments: Morality, authority and obedience in Stanley Milgram's account
【2h】

The resistance experiments: Morality, authority and obedience in Stanley Milgram's account

机译:抵抗实验:斯坦利米尔格兰姆的叙述中的道德,权威和服从

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The paper seeks to re‐conceptualize Stanley Milgram's (in)famous experiments on willing obedience by drawing solely on Milgram's own contemporary account. It identifies a substantial incongruence between the findings Milgram presented (i.e., his description of the experiments) and the meaning he imputed to them (i.e., his interpretation of the exper iments). It argues that instead of operationalizing the concepts he claimed to operationalize – legitimate authority, embodied morality and willing obedience –, Milgram's description suggests that the operative forces in the experiments were an illegitimate authority and acts which in effect collude with that authority. As a result, the paper concludes that what the experimental findings represented was not so much obedience out of choice, but out of coercion. Thus, the paper seeks to redirect the conceptual‐moral focus of the findings from the participants who “shockingly” obeyed to those who managed to resist the force of the total experimental situation.
机译:本文试图通过仅借鉴米尔格拉姆自己的当代观点,重新构想斯坦利·米尔格拉姆(臭名昭著的自愿服从实验)的概念。它确定了米尔格拉姆(Milgram)提出的发现(即他对实验的描述)与他赋予实验结果的意义(即他对实验的解释)之间的重大矛盾。它认为,米尔格拉姆的描述并没有实施他声称要实施的概念-合法的权威,体现的道德和愿意的服从,而是暗示实验中的操作力量是非法的权威,并且实际上与该权威合谋。结果,论文得出的结论是,实验结果所代表的并不是那么多的服从选择,而是出于强制。因此,本文试图将那些“震惊地”服从参与者的发现的概念-道德焦点转移到那些设法抵抗整个实验情况的力量上的参与者。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kaposi, Dávid;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号